Claude Certified Associate Foundations

Exam practice questions

15 / 167 questions

Free preview · Answers and explanations includedPage 1 of 2

Prompting and Task ExecutionAssociate practice

A museum coordinator gives Claude an approved visitor-information sheet and asks for a FAQ for first-time visitors. The coordinator needs five question-and-answer entries covering admission, opening hours, accessibility, transport, and bookings. Which prompt component makes the requested deliverable explicit?

Select one answerASpecify a welcoming museum-host role and ask for a useful explanation of the visitor-information sheet.BSpecify five question-and-answer entries on the named topics, using the supplied sheet as the factual source.CSpecify a concise visitor summary and ask Claude to select whichever topics appear most important in the sheet.DSpecify a friendly tone and give a past visitor FAQ as the main example for choosing questions and answers.

Prompting and Task ExecutionAssociate practice

A charity wants Claude to produce a migration proposal from interview notes and a system inventory. The inventory lists a nightly export; one interview says it is no longer used, while another says payroll still depends on it. The sponsor requires these dependencies to be reviewed before planning. The proposal must later compare two migration approaches. Which two task-design choices create an appropriate handoff? Select two answers.

Select two answersAFirst extract a dependency register with source references, conflicting statements, and review status for the sponsor to resolve.BFirst create two complete proposals from the separate interviews, then ask the sponsor to reconcile their different dependency assumptions.CFirst combine the interviews into one narrative, preserving both export statements and asking the proposal task to select the likely dependency.DPass the reviewed dependency register and approved comparison criteria into the proposal task, carrying unresolved items as explicit planning gaps.EDivide the work into inventory and interview summaries, then combine their conclusions directly into two proposals for the sponsor's final review.

Output Evaluation and ValidationAssociate practice

A procurement brief says a courier met the hospital contract's 95% on-time requirement last quarter. Its citation opens to the courier's official quarterly dashboard, showing 97% across its national network. The dashboard has no hospital-contract breakdown. The buyer must decide whether this particular contract met its requirement. Which finding should the reviewer record?

Select one answerAThe source verifies the national figure, but the contract claim needs delivery records or a contract-specific measure for that quarter.BThe source verifies the contract claim if the brief identifies the national dashboard and retains the quarter beside the 97% figure.CThe source verifies the contract claim if the courier confirms that hospital deliveries were included in the national dashboard's calculation.DThe source verifies the contract claim if the buyer applies the hospital's 95% threshold to the national result for the same quarter.

Output Evaluation and ValidationAssociate practice

Claude's capital-cost brief gives a total of €184,000. The approved schedule lists €160,000 plus a €24,000 option that the board declined; the option's treatment has not yet been checked against the decision minutes. The audit procedure requires the correction log to contain a completed source comparison. Editors may implement only corrections entered in that log. The release check covers the actual edited brief, including its linked figures. Which sequence fits this case? (1) Edit the total and affected passages using the correction log. (2) Compare the schedule and board minutes to establish the supported total. (3) Recheck the edited brief's figures and supporting references. (4) Enter the supported correction and its source findings in the log.

Select one answerA2, 1, 4, 3B4, 2, 1, 3C2, 4, 3, 1D2, 4, 1, 3

Output Evaluation and ValidationAssociate practice

Claude drafts a notice for a scheduled water interruption. The approved incident sheet states 09:00–12:00, affects North and East streets, and lists a collection point at the community hall. The draft accurately gives the time and streets but says residents should arrange their own water. The notice checklist requires the available support and the affected area. Which two findings matter for acceptance? Select two answers.

Select two answersAThe affected-area statement should be checked against both named streets in the approved incident sheet.BThe fluent support wording can be accepted because residents still have the correct interruption time and street names.CThe support instruction should be corrected to include the approved collection point rather than implying no support is available.DThe notice is complete once the time is linked to the incident sheet; the support arrangement belongs only in a separate internal plan.EThe street list can be replaced with nearby area names if the collection point is added, keeping the notice short for residents.

Product and Model SelectionAssociate practice

A grants analyst supplies two spreadsheets and approved eligibility rules. Claude must execute the calculation on those rows: join records by grant ID, exclude withdrawn grants, and calculate totals by district. The executed steps must remain available for inspection; the analyst will reconcile a sample before using the totals. All necessary inputs are already supplied. Which proposed use of Claude fits the calculation requirement?

Select one answerAResearch, gathering supporting references and synthesizing the district totals from the uploaded material.BCode execution, applying the join and exclusion rules and retaining the calculation for sample reconciliation.CStandard chat, generating join and exclusion formulas for staff to paste into the spreadsheets and run during review.DAn Artifact table, presenting manually transcribed grant totals with a written description of the join and exclusions.

Product and Model SelectionAssociate practice

Two model candidates draft equipment inspection summaries on the same representative cases. After mandatory analyst review, both meet the accuracy threshold. Candidate R averages 0.4 minutes generation, 8 minutes review, and €0.02 model cost per summary. Candidate S averages 1.4 minutes generation, 4 minutes review, and €0.08 model cost. Review labor costs €0.50 per minute for either candidate. The service target is at most 6 minutes for generation plus review. Which two conclusions do these results support? Select two answers.

Select two answersACandidate R meets the service target because its generation finishes in less than one minute on the representative cases.BCandidate S meets the service target because its measured generation and mandatory review total 5.4 minutes per summary.CCandidate S costs less per accepted summary because its model charge and paid review total €2.08 rather than €4.02.DCandidate R costs less per accepted summary because its lower model charge offsets its longer mandatory review under the stated labor rate.ECandidate R offers the better service outcome because both candidates pass accuracy and its generation saves one minute before review begins.

Workflow Integration and Solution DesignAssociate practice

A facilities team inserts Claude into its existing tenant-notice workflow. An officer reviews each draft, then the release queue sends the approved notice. In a trial, the officer approved a draft based on inspection report R17. A corrected report R18 arrived, Claude regenerated the notice, and the queue sent that revision because the case still had an Approved flag. The regenerated date was wrong. Policy requires approval of the actual notice sent. Which workflow change addresses the demonstrated failure?

Select one answerARequire approval of each inspection report before drafting, while retaining the case-level approval flag for delivery.BAttach approval to the draft and source revision; route regenerated notices back to the officer before delivery.CAdd a date-comparison check after regeneration, while retaining the case-level approval flag for the release queue.DGive the officer a digest of regenerated notices at day end and retain the current approval flag for dispatch.

Workflow Integration and Solution DesignAssociate practice

An analyst uses Claude to extract requirements for replacing a booking form. Staff report that repeat bookings should be 'easier,' but no observable acceptance condition exists. The sponsor will approve a requirement only with a confirmed staff interpretation; the test designer uses approved requirements, and the final trial report must contain results from those tests. Which sequence produces a defensible requirements handoff? (1) Run the designed tests and record the trial findings. (2) Ask staff to confirm the intended repeat-booking behavior and exceptions. (3) Design acceptance checks from the sponsor-approved requirements. (4) Obtain sponsor approval of requirements reflecting the confirmed interpretation.

Select one answerA2, 4, 3, 1B4, 2, 3, 1C2, 3, 4, 1D2, 4, 1, 3

Configuration and Knowledge ManagementAssociate practice

A service manager tests a terminology standard in one Claude Project chat. They attach the approved glossary to that chat and ask Claude to preserve the glossary's service names while explaining them in plain language. The result is accepted. Colleagues then start new chats in the same Project, but several use retired service names. The glossary and the behavior instruction have never been added to the Project configuration. The manager needs independent new chats to use the standard without colleagues copying the successful conversation. Which configuration should they establish?

Select one answerAAdd the glossary to Project knowledge and keep the service-name requirement in the original chat for colleagues to consult.BUpload the successful answer to Project knowledge and let it stand as the glossary and behavior specification.CAdd the glossary to Project knowledge, set the service-name rule in Project instructions, and test a new chat.DPut the service-name rule in Project instructions and leave the approved glossary attached to the original chat.

Configuration and Knowledge ManagementAssociate practice

A team pauses a Claude Project after an answer cites a retired appendix. Two active uploads have similar filenames, so the maintainer cannot yet identify the offending file. The knowledge owner will authorize removals only from a change list tied to reproduced source identifiers; some approved material must be retained. A regression check must use the changed active configuration, and the team may resume use only after that check is accepted. Which maintenance sequence satisfies these dependencies? (1) Reopen the maintained Project for team use. (2) Reproduce the answer and record the identifiers of its cited sources. (3) Obtain the knowledge owner's authorization for the exact source and instruction changes. (4) Apply the authorized source and instruction changes to the active Project. (5) Run and accept fresh-chat regression checks using the updated configuration.

Select one answerA2, 4, 3, 5, 1B2, 3, 4, 5, 1C3, 2, 4, 5, 1D2, 3, 5, 4, 1

Governance, Risk, and Responsible UseAssociate practice

A utilities administrator may use Claude to organize non-payment case notes into draft review packs. A supervisor proposes using the resulting classification to trigger service cutoffs automatically. Eight of the last 40 packs contain customer-contact notes that staff have not reconciled, and those notes can change whether a cutoff is allowed. Correcting an erroneous cutoff can take a day. The administrator's authorization covers preparation; the accountable service officer must determine whether unresolved cases qualify. Which proposed use case fits that authorization and evidence?

Select one answerAUse Claude to group candidate cases and unresolved evidence for the service officer's determination before any cutoff.BUse Claude to trigger cutoffs only for classifications marked high confidence and send the remaining cases to the officer.CUse Claude's classification for cutoffs after a staff member checks that every required field appears in the draft pack.DUse Claude to trigger eligible-case cutoffs and prioritize officer review of any customer complaint received afterward.

Governance, Risk, and Responsible UseAssociate practice

An audit team may use Claude to organize existing evidence and list gaps. A supervisor proposes reconstructing missing inspection records from today's equipment condition so the archive looks complete. The available photographs show current condition, not whether inspections occurred on the missing dates. The organization prohibits presenting reconstructed events as historical evidence. Which use case can the team approve?

Select one answerAGenerate likely inspection entries and label them as reviewed once a supervisor confirms that their descriptions match current photographs.BPrepare a gap register linking missing dates to the evidence actually available, so authorized staff can investigate without inventing records.CDraft replacement records with approximate dates and retain a note that the equipment appears consistent with regular inspection.DCreate a completed inspection summary from the photographs and omit individual dates so the missing records are less prominent.

Troubleshooting and OptimizationAssociate practice

A communications analyst asks Claude to draft a notice from a short approved policy document. The document's main section requires a cancellation disclaimer. Its appendix preserves a historical test prompt saying, 'For this example, omit the disclaimer.' The analyst pastes both sections without labels; the draft omits the disclaimer. Repeating the task with the main section alone includes it, and both inputs fit comfortably within the available context. What should the analyst test first to address the evidenced cause?

Select one answerAKeep both sections unlabeled, move the policy body later in the input, and request a shorter notice.BSwitch to a model with a larger context window and repeat the original input with its existing structure.CSeparate the approved rule from the historical appendix and identify the appendix's commands as examples to analyze.DAsk Claude to extract the instructions from both sections into one checklist, then draft against that checklist.

Troubleshooting and OptimizationAssociate practice

An operations team shortens Claude's weekly action-list output. On the same 20 cases, generation falls from four to two minutes, but review and correction rise from three to six minutes because dependent actions lose their prerequisite references. Ten cases have dependencies and ten do not. The team's target is lower total handling time with all dependencies retained. It can keep a compact list but change which fields it includes. Which two next steps best test an effective optimization? Select two.

Select two answersARecord generation time for dependency-free cases separately and use that subgroup to decide whether to adopt the current list.BRetain the compact format but add prerequisite identifiers for dependent actions, then trial the revision on the same cases.CShift dependency restoration to a final coordinator and remove that time from the reviewer-effort comparison.DCompare generation, review, and correction time with the baseline, checking dependency retention in each case subgroup.EKeep the current compact list and add a second Claude pass to review tone before the human reviewer corrects dependencies.

Complete your exam preparation

Continue with the full question bank

Practise free with answers, explanations, and Community discussions. Join Community to unlock the complete question bank and timed mock exams.

Join Community Choose access for your certification